New white paper: Assessment Results You Can Trust
Posted by John Kleeman
Questionmark published an important white paper about why trustable assessment results matter and about how an assessment management system like Questionmark’s can help you make your assessments valid and reliable — and therefore trustable.
The white paper, which I wrote together with Questionmark CEO Eric Shepherd, explains that trustable assessment results must be both valid (measuring what you are looking for them to measure) and reliable (consistently measuring what you want to be measured).
The paper draws upon the metaphor of a doctor using results from a blood test to diagnose an illness and then prescribe a remedy. Delays will occur if the doctor orders the wrong test, and serious consequences could result if the test’s results are untrustworthy. Using this metaphor, it is easy to understand the personnel and organizational risks that can stem from making decisions based on untrustworthy results. If you assesses someone’s knowledge, skill or competence for health and safety or regulatory compliance purposes, you need to ensure that your assessment instrument is designed correctly and runs consistently.
Engaging subject matter experts to generate questions to measure the knowledge, skills and abilities required to perform essential tasks of the job is essential in creating the initial pool of questions. However, subject matter experts are not necessarily experts in writing good questions, so an effective authoring system requires a quality control process which allows assessment experts (e.g. instructional designers or psychometricians) to easily review and amend assessment items.
For assessments to be valid and reliable, it’s necessary to follow structured processes at each step from planning through authoring to delivery and reporting.
The white paper covers these six stages of the assessment process:
- Planning assessment
- Authoring items
- Assembling assessment
- Pilot and review
- Analyze results
Following the advice in the white paper and using the capabilities it describes will help you produce assessments that are more valid and reliable — and hence more trustable.
Modern organizations need their people to be competent.
Would you be comfortable in a high-rise building designed by an unqualified architect? Would you fly in a plane whose pilot hadn’t passed a flying test? Would you let someone operate a machine in your factory if they didn’t know what to do if something went wrong? Would you send a sales person out on a call if they didn’t know what your products do? Can you demonstrate to a regulatory authority that your staff are competent and fit for their jobs if you do not have trustable assessments?
In all these cases and many more, it’s essential to have a reliable and valid test of competence. If you do not ensure that your workforce is qualified and competent, then you should not be surprised if your employees have accidents, cause your organization to be fined for regulatory infractions, give poor customer service or can’t repair systems effectively.
To download the white paper, click here.
John will be talking more about trustable assessments at our 2015 Users Conference in Napa next month. Register today for the full conference, but if you cannot make it, make sure to catch the live webcast.