Posted by Jim Farrell
Our Users Conferences are a time for us to celebrate our accomplishments and look forward to the challenges that lie in front of us. This year’s conference was full of amazing sessions presented by Questionmark staff and customers. Our software is being used to solve complex business problems. From a product standpoint, it is the very exciting to bring these real-life scenarios to our development teams to inspire them.
So where do we go from here? The Conference is our chance to stand in front of our customers and get feedback on our roadmap. We also held smaller “Future Solutions” focus groups to get feedback from our customers on what we have done and what we could do in the future to help them. In the best of times, these are an affirmation that we are on the right path. This was definitely one of those years.
One of our Future Solutions sessions focused on authoring. During that session, Doug Peterson and I laid out the future of Questionmark Live. This included an aggressive delivery cycle that will bring future releases at a rapid pace. Stay tuned for videos on new features available soon.
Ok…enough about us. This conference is really about our customers. The panel and peer discussion strand of this year’s conference had some of the most interesting topics. John Kleeman has already mentioned the security panel with our friends from Pearson Vue, ProctorU, Innovative Exams and Shenandoah University.
Another session that stood out was as a peer discussion test defensibility using the Angoff method to set cut scores. This conversation was very interesting to me as someone who once had to create defensible assessments. I am eager to see organizations utilize Angoff because not only do you want legally defensible assessments, you want to define levels of competency for a role and be able to determine how that can predict future performance.
For those of you who do not know, the Angoff method is a way for Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) to grade the probability of a marginal student getting a question right. Attendees at this conference session were provided a handout that includes a seven-step flowchart guiding them in the design, development and implementation of the Angoff method.
If you are interested in Angoff and setting test scores I highly recommend reading Criterion-Referenced Test Development written by our good friends Sharon Shrock and Bill Coscarelli.
We really hope to see everyone at the 2013 Users Conference in Baltimore March 3 – 6. (I am hoping we may even get a chance to visit the beautiful Camden Yards!)